Embeddable vs Luzmo: A Complete Technical Comparison for SaaS Teams

SaaS teams evaluating embedded analytics often compare tools that look similar on the surface but are built around very different assumptions.

Luzmo is an embedded BI platform designed to help SaaS teams add dashboards quickly, with a focus on ease of setup, chart configuration and packaged embedding for customer facing analytics.

Embeddable is a developer-first analytics toolkit built for teams that want analytics to feel like a native part of their product, with full UI control, performance patterns designed for scale, and flexible multi-tenant security.

This guide compares both approaches across architecture, developer experience, customization, performance, security, multi tenancy, pricing and long term maintainability to help product and engineering teams make an informed decision.

If you’re building customer-facing analytics inside a SaaS product, Embeddable is generally a better fit than Luzmo because it offers deeper UI control, stronger performance patterns, and predictable scaling. Luzmo is better suited to teams looking for quick embedded dashboards with minimal customization needs.

TLDR;

Luzmo

• Purpose built for embedded analytics.
  
• Fast to get started with pre built dashboards and charts.
  
• Embedding primarily relies on iframes and SDK wrappers.
  
• Customization is limited to theming and configuration.
  
• Pricing scales per viewer, which can become expensive as customers grow.
  

Embeddable

• Designed for customer facing SaaS analytics at scale.
  
• Native DOM embedding with no iframes.
  
• Full UI and interaction control.
  
• Multi layer caching for consistent performance.
  
• Tenant aware RLS built for multi tenant products.
  
• Flat, predictable pricing with unlimited users.
  

Quick Overview: Embeddable vs Luzmo at a Glance

Embedding method

Embeddable:

• Native DOM rendering via web components, React and Vue.
  
• No iframes.
  
• Two way interaction with your application logic and UI state.
  

Luzmo:

• Embedding via iframes or JavaScript SDK wrappers.
  
• Dashboards run in an isolated container.
  
• Limited interaction outside the SDK surface.
  

Customization

Embeddable:

• Fully customizable components and layouts.
  
• Matches your design system exactly.
  
• Supports custom charts and interactions.
  

Luzmo:

• Theming and configuration options available.
  
• Core layout and UI remain Luzmo controlled.
  
• Hard to achieve pixel perfect parity with your product.
  

Performance

Embeddable:

• Multi layer caching including L1 in memory and L2 pre aggregations.
  
• Designed for high concurrency customer facing analytics.
  

Luzmo:

• Performance depends on dashboard complexity and query volume.
  
• Embedded dashboards add iframe overhead.
  
• High concurrency scenarios require plan upgrades.
  

Multi tenancy

Embeddable:

• Server issued security tokens.
  
• Row level, column level and tenant isolation built in.
  
• No dashboard duplication per tenant.
  

Luzmo:

• Supports multi tenancy through security rules and parameters.
  
• Often requires careful configuration per customer.
  
• Can become harder to manage as tenant count increases.
  

Setup time

Embeddable:

• Fast setup with minimal infrastructure.
  
• Designed for embedding from day one.
  

Luzmo:

• Very quick initial setup.
  
• Low barrier to creating dashboards and charts.
  

Integration depth

Embeddable:

• Dashboards render directly inside your DOM.
  
• Tight integration with app state, routing and UI logic.
  

Luzmo:

• Dashboards live inside an iframe.
  
• Interaction handled through SDK events and filters.
  
• Less flexibility for deep UX integration.
  

Pricing

Embeddable:

• Flat predictable pricing.
  
• Unlimited users, viewers and dashboards.
  

Luzmo:

• Pricing scales by number of end users or viewers.
  
• Costs increase as customer adoption grows.
  

Deployment options

Embeddable: Cloud or self hosted.

Luzmo: Cloud hosted only.

End user experience

Embeddable: Feels fully native to your application.

Luzmo: Feels like an embedded analytics layer rather than a native feature.

What Is Luzmo

Overview and core philosophy

Luzmo, formerly known as Cumul.io, is an embedded BI platform focused on helping SaaS teams add analytics quickly. It provides a visual dashboard builder, chart configuration tools and SDKs that make embedding relatively straightforward.

The platform prioritizes ease of use and time to first dashboard, which makes it attractive for early stage products or teams that want analytics without heavy engineering investment.

Strengths of Luzmo

• Purpose built for embedded analytics.
  
• Fast onboarding and dashboard creation.
  
• Supports common SaaS embedding patterns.
  
• No need to build analytics infrastructure from scratch.
  

Limitations for embedded SaaS use cases

• Embedding relies on iframes.
  
• UI customization is constrained by Luzmo’s components.
  
• Performance tuning options are limited.
  
• Pricing scales with end users.
  
• Harder to support complex product specific UX and workflows.
  

What Is Embeddable

Overview and philosophy

Embeddable is a developer first analytics toolkit designed for SaaS teams that treat analytics as a core product feature. Instead of embedding a BI tool, teams embed native components that render inside their own application.

This approach gives full control over UI, performance and behavior, while still removing the burden of building and maintaining analytics infrastructure.

Key strengths of Embeddable

• Native DOM embedding with no iframe limitations.
  
• Full UI control and extensibility.
  
• High performance through multi tier caching.
  
• Powerful end user self serve dashboard builder.
  
• Secure, scalable multi tenant RLS patterns.
  
• Developer friendly workflows with versioning and CI CD.
  

Ideal use cases

• Customer facing analytics inside SaaS products.
  
• Products where UX consistency matters.
  
• Multi tenant platforms with growing user bases.
  
• Teams outgrowing iframe based embedded BI tools.
  

Feature Comparison Deep Dive

1. Developer experience

Luzmo:

• Visual dashboard builder with configuration driven setup.
  
• Minimal coding required for basic use cases.
  
• SDK used for embedding and interactions.
  
• Limited flexibility for custom behaviors.
  

Embeddable:

• Code first approach with optional no code tooling.
  
• Native SDKs for JavaScript, React and Vue.
  
• Full control over events, variables and interactions.
  
• Versioned environments aligned with modern engineering workflows.
  

What it implies
Luzmo is optimized for speed and simplicity.
Embeddable is optimized for long term product ownership and flexibility.

2. Performance and scalability

Luzmo:

• Performance depends on dashboard complexity and usage volume.
  
• iframe rendering adds overhead.
  
• Scaling requires plan upgrades as usage grows.
  

Embeddable:

• L1 in memory caching for hot queries.
  
• L2 pre aggregations for large datasets.
  
• Caching API for tenant aware refresh strategies.
  
• Lightweight rendering for consistent UX.
  

What it implies
Luzmo works well at small to medium scale.
Embeddable is designed for high concurrency SaaS environments.

3. UI customization and design fidelity

Luzmo:

• Theming options available.
  
• Layout and interaction patterns remain Luzmo defined.
  
• Hard to fully match your design system.
  

Embeddable:

• Complete control over styling and layout.
  
• Supports custom components and charts.
  
• Dashboards feel like part of your product.
  

What it implies
If analytics need to look and behave exactly like your app, Embeddable offers far more flexibility.

4. Security and multi tenancy

Luzmo:

• Supports row level security and user based filtering.
  
• Requires careful configuration as tenant count grows.
  

Embeddable:

• Tenant aware security tokens define access.
  
• Row level, column level and object level policies.
  
• No dashboard duplication or complex rules.
  
• Enterprise grade security standards supported.
  

What it implies
Both support multi-tenancy, but Embeddable’s model is more scalable and easier to reason about for large SaaS products.

5. Pricing and ROI

Luzmo:

• Pricing scales with the number of end users.
  
• Can become costly as analytics adoption increases.
  

Embeddable:

• Flat predictable pricing.
  
• Unlimited users and dashboards.
  
• Better cost alignment with SaaS growth.
  

What it implies
Luzmo lowers the barrier to entry.
Embeddable lowers long term cost and operational complexity.

When to Choose Luzmo

Best for

• Early stage SaaS products adding analytics quickly.
  
• Teams that want minimal engineering involvement.
  
• Simple embedded dashboards with limited customization needs.
  

Where it falls short

• iframe based UX.
  
• Limited design control.
  
• Performance tuning constraints.
  
• Pricing grows with customer adoption.
  

When to Choose Embeddable

Best for

• SaaS products where analytics are a core feature.
  
• Teams that care about UX consistency and performance.
  
• Multi tenant environments at scale.
  
• Developer led organizations with long term product roadmaps.
  

Added value

• Native rendering with no iframe boundaries.
  
• Predictable pricing as usage grows.
  
• High performance for interactive dashboards.
  
• Lower long term engineering overhead.
  
• Strong end user self serve capabilities.
  

Closing perspective

Luzmo is a solid choice when speed and simplicity are the priority and analytics are an add on rather than a defining part of the product. It helps teams get dashboards in front of users quickly, especially in early stages.

Embeddable is better suited for teams that view analytics as a first class product feature. By prioritizing native embedding, performance at scale and full control over UX, it enables SaaS teams to grow customer facing analytics without running into the limitations of iframe based tools.

‍

FAQs

Is Embeddable better suited for SaaS products than Luzmo?

Embeddable is generally a better fit for SaaS products where analytics are a core part of the product experience because it offers native embedding, full UI control, and scalable multi-tenant performance. Luzmo is better for teams focused on getting dashboards live quickly with minimal engineering overhead.

What is the main difference between Embeddable and Luzmo?

The key difference is in how analytics are embedded and controlled. Luzmo provides configuration-driven embeds with UI constrained by its platform, whereas Embeddable enables native DOM embedding with deeper control over UX, interactions, and performance.

How do Embeddable and Luzmo compare on customization?

Luzmo offers theming and configuration options, but dashboards retain platform-defined layouts and behaviors. Embeddable allows full customization of layout, styling, components, and interactions to match a product’s design system.

Which platform performs better at scale?

Embeddable is designed for high-concurrency, multi-tenant SaaS environments using multi-tier caching and pre-aggregations. Luzmo performs well for moderate usage but may require additional planning and optimization as traffic and complexity grow.

How do Embeddable and Luzmo handle multi-tenancy?

Embeddable uses tenant-aware security tokens with row-level and object-level access controls designed for SaaS scale. Luzmo supports multi-tenant use cases through configuration, but tenant management can become more complex as product usage grows.

Which tool requires more engineering effort to get started?

Luzmo generally requires less upfront engineering effort and enables faster time to first embed for simple dashboards. Embeddable requires more initial setup but provides greater flexibility and long-term maintainability.